19 Dec Are you able to submit a paper up to a scholarly, peer-reviewed log without PhD and obtain it accepted?
Are you able to submit a paper to a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal without PhD? More particularly, just exactly exactly what will be the smallest amount skills that could give one the chance for the paper being posted in a peer-reviewed scholastic medium?
11 Answers 11
Publishing a paper that is academic publication (and possibly setting it up accepted) will not need any qualifications whatsoever. You do not need a PhD; you do not also have to have attended university. There are not any academic, work, or account demands at all.
That is not to say this’s an easy task to obtain a paper accepted without any training that is formal the field. Learning how exactly to compose a paper that is compelling easier if you’ve got a mentor to supply guidance. Nonetheless, then your lack of a PhD will not be held against you if you can figure out how to do it without a PhD.
Yes, you can get a paper posted with out a PhD: PhD pupils get it done on a regular basis. Presented papers are likely to be assessed relating to whatever they state, maybe perhaps maybe not whom said it.
Yes. In practice, graduate research is just one of the main ways people achieve the abilities to publish this type of paper, but a Ph.D. just isn’t a necessity. Skills will be a range of the individual log, but I do not understand of any which have an insurance policy of requiring degree qualifications from submitters. As an example, very often graduate or undergraduate students compose such documents.
Being an example that is extreme here are a few groundbreaking pre- or no-PhD discoveries:
Henri Lebesgue developed their famous integration concept as a new twelfth grade instructor in 1902.
Space–time block coding, a theoretical concept that has become important to cordless communications, ended up being designed in 1997 by Siavash Alamouti being a practicing engineer by having a master’s level.
The AKS primality test had been the consequence of 2002 research that is undergraduate the Indian Institute of tech.
It is clear that such efforts warrant a book regardless of the writer’s status.
It is not only feasible however it is a necessity at numerous universities that your particular Ph.D thesis be entirely centered on peer evaluated documents.
Another problem this can be a undeniable fact that in technology just the research outcomes should make a difference, maybe maybe not who’s presenting those outcomes. If Prof. Dr. X has submitted a paper that is found to be wanting, then it must be rejected. Then that paper should be accepted if John Doe Y who dropped out of primary school, submits a paper containing ground breaking results. Then that would mean that science is not conducted in an independent way if this were not (in principle) true. Arguments from authority, in the place of those on the basis of the merits would for some level corrupt the process that is scientific.
I will be much more skeptical as compared to greater part of the responses.
The reason that is first more profane: you can find journals with increased reputation plus some with less reputation. The journals with additional reputation do have more visitors and if you should be posted in this paper, it will probably foster your reputation. The direct impact is everyone else attempts to get published within the many prestigous journals. So that the editors have swamped with documents and must select by concern. If two email address details are similarly impressive, the likelihood that the greater amount of experienced and scientist that is reputable be posted is extremely high.
So that the standard approach is to get hold of the journals in descending purchase of reputation and request book. Therefore, yes, you will be posted, however it is most most likely that you need to go with a log with less reputation and therefore means your outcomes are usually ignored.
That get us towards the 2nd issue: when you yourself have a remarkable outcome, then your editors will scan your paper more closely. Uncommon language (there clearly was a particular lingo you utilize in documents), strange structure (Word rather Latex) and an extraordinary be a consequence of a person who just isn’t known before raises a red security. Then i say, nope, this is not remotely true if Anonymous Mathematica claims that “your lack of a PhD will not be held against you. It’s very most most likely which you as well as your paper are not scrutinized any longer and rejected. In the event that you decide to try to fight your choice, the label crackpot is mounted on you faster than it is possible to inhale. And that means you needs to be exceedingly careful to write a paper as amateur. Specially because you can find journals that are therefore. problematic that publishing here will damage your reputation.
An endorsement is used by the arXiv system to ensure that only people from universities and research facilities can submit documents; other individuals are locked away.
In the event that you obviously have a remarkable outcome: both in situations, arXiv and respectable journal it really is unfortuitously required to contact some body from a college etc. which assists you to definitely get through the barrier.
Therefore, principially yes, but you will find obstacles. Try not to underestimate the issue.
MODIFY: some given information upfront. The trustworthiness of the impact measures a journal element and because 2005 additionally because of the h-index. For 2013 Nature has ranking 7 into the effect element with 38.6 and leads the h-index with 829. Technology has rank 20 (but is preceded by 9 (!) Nature specializations) and it is 2nd regarding the h-index with 801. Therefore pretty essential journals. Nature provides a synopsis on the book procedure as well as in reality the rejection price steadily increased from 89% to 92percent that we would phone “swamping”.
Corvus now claims that my analysis is glaringly incorrect and provides the explanation that other journals except Nature and Science don’t have the need to choose between papers, if i’ve recognized him appropriate.
Corvus, it really is your declare that other high-reputable journals both by h-index and impact element don’t have the situation with selecting a paper and rejection that is therefore high ? Can you stay by the claim ? If my info is how to write an abstract for scientific paper outdated or simply just incorrect, I quickly will retract it, but We will research it. Glaringly incorrect, yes or no ?
JeffE, can you concur that being of user for the Computer Science Department in Illinois (which incidentally built the ORDVAC and ILLIAC consequently they are presently accountable for the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure) with an extremely long tradition and an very own ACM chapter might offer a paper some suggestion ?